Dakota Arms of Sturgis, South Dakota, celebrated their 10th
anniversary in 1997. While not an old company by any means - particularly when compared to
Winchester, Remington or even Ruger - it has been a very innovative one.
The early years of the company were devoted to but one model, the Dakota 76 rifle. The
heart of the rifle, the action, is functionally an amalgamation of the best features of
the 98 Mauser and the pre-64 Model 70 Winchester. Cosmetically though, it is a dead ringer
for the Model 70.
While Dakota Arms has been very successful with the Model 76, company president Don
Allen felt the need for a lower cost Dakota model to compete in another segment of the
market. The Dakota 76, a wonderful rifle in every respect, is very expensive to produce,
largely due to the amount of machining necessary to turn out the action and the handwork
involved in the semi-custom nature of its construction.
Allen took on the project of developing an action that would contain all the desirable
features of the 76 action-controlled round feed, three position safety, velvet smooth
functioning and match grade triggers-yet at a considerably lower production cost.
Allen followed the lead of other manufactures by developing an action that could be
machined from round stock instead of a rectangular block of steel. Using round stock
reduces the number of machining operations considerably.
The major problem in using round stock instead of a block of steel as the raw material
is the recoil lug. Using a block of steel provides ample material to mill an integral
recoil lug into the action. With round stock though, there is no excess material from
which to mill the lug.
Several solutions to this problem are in use. One is to simply weld on a recoil lug.
Another, and the one that Allen chose to use, is to add the separate recoil lug between
the barrel shank and action ring. When the barrel is screwed into the action, it firmly
locks the recoil lug into place.
Economy Of Shooting
The new action was dubbed the model 97 and instead of providing a walnut stock for the
rifle (which would of course, run the price up), Dakota choose to work with HS Precision
and use their synthetic stock for the rifle. With the action bedded into a block of
aluminum in the stock, the finished rifle turned out to be very accurate.
Dakota has added the model, called the Hunter, to their line and is selling it for
$1,695. While still no bargain basement special, it is considerably less costly than the
other Dakota models. Dakota also reduced their cost by leaving off the machined steel
magazine box and trigger guard sans floorplate.
For quite some time I had been looking for a rifle to use in long range shooting. When
I heard about the new Dakota action, I decided to use it. That gave me an opportunity to
evaluate the action and, at the same time, do my technology experimentation with the
resulting rifle.
After a quick call to discuss the project with Paulette Kok, Dakotas sales
manager, I ordered a rifle from Dakota. I asked them to finish the barrel at 26". I
had specified the rifle to be chambered for the .300 Dakota cartridge and the extra couple
inches of barrel length would provide me with better performance.
I worked with Dakotas production engineer, Ward Dobler, on the details of the
rifle. Dobler fired the gun with a variety of loads. Once the baseline groups were
available, I then removed the barrel from the rifle and sent it out to be cryogenically
treated.
Cryogenically treating steel is a process that has been around for quite some time.
Simply stated, it involves slowly freezing the steel to about -300 degrees or thereabouts,
then bringing temperature back to ambient. The process realigns the molecular structure of
the steel which, among other things, toughens the steel considerably.
I am told that machinists have used the process for years on their cutters to increase
their useful life span. Apparently, the application of this technology on rifle barrels is
relatively new. An added benefit is that sometimes the process will result in increased
accuracy potential from the treated barrel.
When my barrel came back, Dobler reinstalled it on the rifle and took it back to the
range with the same assortment of loads that he used before. On my rifle, the accuracy was
not materially affected, one way or the other. Still, the process is very worthwhile
simply due to increased longevity.
This gun is a bit different from my normal taste in rifles. First, the barrel is
26" long - at least 3" longer than any other rifle in my battery. It is also the
only rifle I own with a laminated stock. Even so, it is stocked in the classic style and
the lines are exactly as they should be. Although different from my norm, it is a
beautiful and highly functional rifle.
The test groups were very good, averaging a little more than 1 MOA. However, for long
range work, I hoped to better that considerably by tailoring a variety of handloads
specifically for my rifle. I also wanted to work up loads using moly coated bullets,
another technological improvement of recent origin.
Molybdenum disulfide powder has been around for a long time and is well known as a
superb lubricant. It has only been recently, however, that it has been applied to bullets.
The coating is applied to the jacket of the bullets to provide several advantages over
otherwise identical, noncoated bullets. For example, when using non-coated bullets, rifle
accuracy will begin to deteriorate due to fouling after several shots. When using moly
coated bullets, however, many more shots can be fired before fouling affects accuracy.
Another benefit to using coated bullets is that they tend to be a bit more accurate.
The reason for this seems to be related to the depth of the engraving of the rifling into
the bullet jacket. When a bullet is driven into the bore, it first engages the rifling.
The rifling is mirror-image engraved into the bullet as it passes through the barrel.
The jacket material displaced in the process tends to flow to the rear of the bullet,
resulting in some deformation and burring at the tail of the projectile. This affects the
flight of the bullet. Moly coated bullets are not engraved by the rifling as deeply as
non-coated bullets are, resulting in less deformation. For this reason, particularly at
long range, moly coated bullets are usually a bit more accurate than non coated bullets.
One Hot Gun
Now that I have the rifle, the components for reloading, and factory fired targets for
comparison, my task is mostly to spend a lot of time a both the reloading and shooting
benches. So far, I have managed to get groups around .690" for three shots.
I believe this degree of accuracy, while very good, can still be bettered considerably.
Over the next few months, as time permits, I intend to find out just how accurate the
rifle is.
I think this gun in certainly capable of ½" or better groups. I am only
.190" from that now with very little experimentation invested. So far, my shooting
has been limited to 100 yards. Once I get the rifle to the best at that range, I would
start shooting groups out to at least 500 yards,
Based on the experience I have had with the new Dakota to date, I have found no
negatives. It has functioned flawlessly, very smooth and very positive. It is a very
worthwhile addition to the Dakota line.
What other use Dakota plans to make of the action, I dont know. Presently, only
the Hunter Model rifle is available although a light weight model will probably be on the
market soon. There are also plans to introduce a shorter length version of the action.
That other uses Allen might have in mind for it, I cant say but I would be
surprised if he doesnt have several other ideas. I am not aware of any plans to
introduce a model of the rifle with a laminated wood stock. It there is a demand it might
be offered as a an option.